After serious tension and argument over Allied grand strategy at the
Casablanca Conference (January 14–24, 1943), the Western Allies agreed
to invade Sicily from North Africa. Operation HUSKY followed in July
1943. The question of invading mainland Italy arose again, with Winston
Churchill and the British Chiefs of Staff pushing hard for what they
believed would be a major drain on the Wehrmacht and support to the Red
Army, by drawing off divisions from the Eastern Front. As the Allies
readied to invade, Adolf Hitler moved significant forces into Italy to
reinforce Army Group “C.” British 8th Army under General Bernard Law
Montgomery landed on the toe of the Italian boot across the Strait of
Messina on September 3, 1943. Montgomery immediately paused to build up
supplies and forces. It was Montgomery at his worst, many have since
argued. It certainly cost him support and credit among some American
military leaders at the time. Yet, the Americans had little better to
offer: Lieutenant General Mark Clark also got off to a bad start in
Italy, and his performance was arguably a good deal worse for the Allied
cause than was Montgomery’s in the long run. Clark was in charge of
U.S. 5th Army landings near Naples at Salerno (Operation AVALANCHE),
carried out on September 9, a day after General Dwight Eisenhower
announced the Italian surrender. He was inexperienced at that level of
command and would ultimately prove to be dangerously vainglorious and
careless of soldiers’ lives. In combination, the Western Allies thus
failed to link the two beachheads or to connect promptly or properly
with the government of Marshal Pietro Badoglio, which had agreed to
coordinate an armistice and a quick and bloodless surrender. Instead,
the handoff was badly botched by Italians and Western Allies alike,
while the Germans moved faster than either to occupy the country.
Heavy naval gunfire helped the Western Allies get onshore and pushed
the Germans back from the landing zone perimeters. But Wehrmacht and
Waffen-SS troops quickly contained and isolated the widely separate
beachheads. Just as rapidly, they disarmed the Italian Army across Italy
and the Balkans. In several locales, Germans butchered their erstwhile
allies by the hundreds, and even thousands. On the island of Cephalonia,
for instance, nearly 5,000 Italian officers and men were executed after
offering resistance to the Germans. Within a short time, 650,000
Italian prisoners were entrained for the Reich to work in forced labor
camps; some 200,000 died there. Meanwhile, German units moved south to
defend a series of fortified lines thrown across the paths that must be
taken by the enemy armies as they moved north. The lodgement at Salerno
came under brisk attack from German 10th Army as Field Marshal Albert
Kesselring reinforced and attacked much faster than the deleterious
Clark. A major effort to crush the lodgement was made by the Germans on
September 12. The situation was recovered for the defenders only by a
desperate drop of two battalions of U.S. 82nd Airborne, in combination
with concentrated naval and air bombardments. German 10th Army began a
phased pullback on September 16, enabling the Americans at Salerno to
finally link with British 8th Army.
Hitler had been skeptical about defending south-central Italy. Now he
reversed course and told Kesselring to hold south of Rome at all costs,
along a hastily constructed set of defensive works dubbed the Bernhardt
Line. Kesselring bloodied the Allies, then fell back to a stronger
position at the Gustav Line. This strategy took full advantage of the
fact that Italy was crossed by rivers on either side of the Apennines.
The river positions were well-defended by the Germans and had to be
crossed under fi re by Allied troops in terrible and costly small boat
assaults. The Italian campaign thus played out as a series of brutal,
unimaginative frontal assaults on a series of Wehrmacht fortified lines
and river positions. As soon as German defenses looked ready to crack,
but just before they did, Kesselring pulled back to a fresh set of lines
already prepared to his rear. That essential pattern marked the
fighting until the end of the war, which did not come in Italy until
just a few days before fighting ended in Germany. Four major and bloody
battles were thus fought from January 1944, before the Germans were
finally driven from their position atop and around Monte Casino on May
18. Each was more like a World War I trench fight than the swift armored
advances both sides had seen in the desert campaign or later in France
and Germany.
The main exception to the pattern of bloody frontal attrition in Italy
was the daring but poorly planned and executed landing at Anzio on
January 22, 1944. That amphibious operation was carried out in an
attempt to use superior sea power to outflank Kesselring and cut off and
kill his armies in a north Italian Kessel . However, the assault troops
took too long to expand the Anzio beachhead. They thereby tossed away
the advantage of operational surprise, a fact that nearly allowed
Kesselring to crush the landing zone and throw them back into the sea.
Only superior air power and precise intelligence, gathered through air
recce and ULTRA intercepts, enabled the Anzio defenders to blunt a major
German counteroffensive from February 16–20. Hard fighting continued
along a slowly expanding perimeter until late May, when 6th Corps at
Anzio finally linked with 2nd Corps of 5th Army and a broad American
advance began. Clark’s 5th Army was part of Allied 15th Army Group led
by Field Marshal Harold Alexander . But Clark never really accepted the
fact that he was Alexander’s subordinate. Over the course of the
campaign Clark lied and disobeyed orders while alternately carping that
Montgomery was secretly conspiring to beat him to Rome, or alternately,
that Montgomery was not moving fast enough. Clark’s insubordination and
frequent command recklessness broke all bounds once he smelled a Roman
triumph for himself following the breakout from Anzio. His disobedience
culminated in the liberation of Rome on June 4, 1944, but only because
he ignored Alexander’s order to cut off and destroy retreating German
10th Army. Instead, Clark took a different road than ordered. That
permitted 10th Army to escape north while he personally drove into Rome
in the role of conqueror-liberator. History does not record that
achievement as decisive. Most historians have judged Clark ever more
harshly as time passed, and the cost of his vanity in lives and wasted
strategic opportunity became more clear. Clark’s own comment on June 6,
1944, that the D-Day landings would steal his headlines from Rome,
speaks volumes on its own.
Some Western commanders were exposed in Italy as incompetent, others as
vainglorious. A few were both. However, everyone was impressed by the
combat power and fighting quality shown by the Wehrmacht in defense, and
by the high level of command skill displayed by Kesselring. The Germans
had to fight at a growing material disadvantage, but did so with
tenacity. Smaller armies, such as the Canadian Army, Free French, and
Polish Army, found lasting moral significance and great pride in blood
sacrifices made on the slopes of Cassino and elsewhere in Italy. Some
British and French soldiers and many of their officers reacted
differently, recalling with bitterness experiences along the Somme and
at Ypres during the last war. Most lamented the low command imagination
of Clark, the slowness of Montgomery, and lack of closer oversight of
subordinates by Alexander. Meanwhile, relations between the British and
American armies and among some top officers deteriorated in tandem with a
growing gulf between London and Washington over the strategic morass
that Italy had become. Arguments that began south of Rome among
participants continued for decades after the war among historians. Some
viewed the entire campaign as another “Churchillian mistake.” Nigel
Hamilton even argued that it approximated a replay of Churchill’s
disastrous Dardanelles campaign during the Great War, with Anzio playing
the role of Gallipoli. However, Douglas Porch has argued that the North
African, Sicilian, and Italian campaigns sponsored by Churchill and the
British High Command were all essential preludes to the decisive
Normandy campaign in France in 1944.
While U.S. 5th Army was driving to break out of the Anzio perimeter,
British 8th Army—with units of Free French, Canadians, Poles, New
Zealanders, and others included—drove up the Adriatic coast of Italy,
making comparably slow progress against the Hitler Line . There followed
two failed American assaults on Monte Cassino. Fresh New Zealand and
Polish attacks were complicated rather than helped by preliminary heavy
bombing that destroyed the monastery and gave more effective cover to
the defending Germans. The Poles finally took the heights, at great cost
in casualties. The Germans, too, were nearly broken by the defense of
Cassino. The French Expeditionary Corps stormed and broke the Hitler
Line simultaneously with the Anzio breakout, but Clark’s fixation on
Montgomery and Rome robbed the Western powers of the chance to wipe out
German 10th Army and race to the Alps. Instead, a hard slog north
resumed after Kesselring fell back to an alpine defense line. Western
resources were drawn away to Normandy for the OVERLORD invasion in June,
then to southern France in August for Operation DRAGOON . As a result
of the failure to properly pursue a defeated enemy after the fall of
Rome, northern Italy would not be liberated until the end of the war in
Europe. By then, Italy had become witness to a civil war among fascisti
of the Salò Republic and pro- Allied partisans, replete with massacres
and reprisals, mass deportation of Italian Jews and former soldiers, and
all the other horrors of Nazi occupation and civil war. From February
1945, Alexander was not even under orders to liberate more Italian
territory. His instructions were instead to hold as many German troops
as he could in Italy while the conquest of Germany was underway.
The Mediterranean strategy of 1942–1943 and the invasion of Italy that
crowned it incurred great costs, but also brought some strategic benefi
ts: it compelled Hitler to cancel ZITADELLE and to transfer elite ground
and air forces from the Eastern Front. It knocked Italy and its armed
forces out of the war. It provided air bases from which to open a new
front in the Combined Bomber Offensive and, notably, for successful
attacks on the Rumanian oil fields and refineries at Ploesti . In
addition, it gave Western ground forces combat experience they lacked
and needed before the main invasion and fight in France. But while the
Italian campaign ground down the Wehrmacht, it also wore out Allied
divisions. By May 1944, there were only 27 German divisions fighting in
Italy. At that time, there were 156 Axis divisions on the Eastern Front.
Stalin had made it clear before the start of the Italian campaign that
he did not approve of an invasion that was never part of the grand
strategy agreed by all the Allies. But he tempered that view by November
1943, acknowledging that the war in Italy made a real contribution to
the larger war against Germany. He said: “The present action of the
Allied armies in the south of Europe do not count as a second front. But
they are something like a second front.”
Even if the Mediterranean path might be justified strategically up to
mid- 1944, most historians believe it was a misguided and wasteful
campaign after the OVERLORD and DRAGOON landings established a true and
continuous second front in France. Although the Western Allies reduced
their effort in Italy once they got ashore in France, they still
incurred many casualties over the final 11 months of the war. It took a
bloody campaign to batter and break through the Gothic Line, then to
fight into well-defended northern valleys and take the many cities of
northern Italy. The last Allied offensive broke through at the Argenta
Gap from April 9–19, 1945. Once Western armies also broke the Adige
Line, they took just over a week to encircle most remaining German
units. Bologna, Ferrara, Genoa, Milan, and Venice were liberated in
rapid succession. On April 29, 1945, all German forces in Italy
surrendered effective at 1200 hours on May 2. In all, Allied casualties
in Italy numbered 312,000. The Germans lost 435,000 men over the course
of the Italian campaign, excluding large prisoner totals from the final
surrenders.
Suggested Reading: D. Graham and S. Bidwell, Tug of War: The Battle for
Italy, 1943–1945 (1986); Richard Lamb, The War in Italy, 1943–1945
(1993).
Excellent article
ReplyDeleteYes excellent article! My uncle was one of 7 men from the 363rd Infantry Regiment killed in action July 5th in Italy 1944.
ReplyDelete